Dpdpa In Action Designing A 72 Hour Breach Response That Actually Works
Industry experts analyze emerging threats surrounding Dpdpa In Action Designing A 72 Hour Breach Response That Actually Works.
Summary
Regulatory focus
A Nullcon panel examines India's DPDP Act Section 8 and Rule 7, requiring data fiduciaries to notify data principals and the Data Protection Board when a personal-data breach occurs.
Cyber vs privacy incidents
INOX GFL group CISO contrasts triggers: ransomware/extortion calls versus media/public leak discovery. Core assets differ (infrastructure vs personal data), impacts differ (ransom vs penalties up to hundreds of crores), and owners differ (CISO vs DPO), though roles often overlap.
Reporting lens
Cyber incidents may fall under IT Act timelines; privacy incidents invoke DPDP/GDPR-style regimes with 72-hour notification expectations.
Proactive response
JSW Paints' Neelamani Sahu urges internal breach identification before public exposure, board notification, then principal communication in plain language covering what leaked, mitigation steps, and user actions. Public discovery means failed controls and reactive damage control rather than ideal playbook execution.
Related talks
nullcon·48 min
Industry experts analyze emerging threats surrounding Goa 2017 - CXO Panel 'Breach Response: Time To Shake Up The Status Quo'.
The Linux Foundation·19 min
Dadisi Sanyika · Ben Powell
Investigates from CDEvents To Actions: Designing the Workflow Conductor and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
RSAC Cybersecurity·1 hr
Industry experts analyze emerging threats surrounding What Was I Thinking?: Bungled Breach Responses.


