Panel Discussion - The Great Debate on Cyberwarfare
Reviews panel Discussion - The Great Debate on Cyberwarfare and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
Summary
Collateral damage in cyberwar
A Zero Day Con panel with Brian Johnson (US university security), Donna Craven (Irish Prison Service), Luke Sutherland (NCIS), and Pat Lordan debates cyberwarfare's state. Johnson, ex-US Army intelligence, says collateral damage planning differs sharply from kinetic ops—attacks spread across shared networks and common vulnerabilities.
Attribution and fear
Luke Sutherland notes cyber attacks lack clear attribution unlike bombers with flags; guerrilla-style anonymity across jurisdictions discourages reporting and aids adversaries. DDoS botnets compound tracing difficulty. Donna Craven urges transparency and collective defense, citing Ireland's HSE ransomware attack as near-warfare with civilian impact.
Organizational response
Panelists stress under-reporting from fear and embarrassment, the law of the jungle in cyberspace, and need to raise costs for bad behavior. Critical infrastructure like prisons must shift from keeping people in physically to keeping attackers out digitally while sharing intelligence across partners.
Related talks
The Linux Foundation·43 min
Sean Goggins · Clare Dillon · Michael P. Nolan · Sayeed Choudhury
Outlines panel Discussion: Measuring Suc and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
The Linux Foundation·44 min
Xiaoya Xia · Richard Bian · Anni Lai · Willem Jiang
Discusses panel Discussion: Global and Regional Ope and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.
The Linux Foundation·39 min
Ildiko Vancsa · Dawn Foster · Nithya Ruff · Allison Randal
Outlines panel Discussion: How to Chart Your Own and evaluates key implications for security practitioners.


