Skip to content

The Interplay Between Safety and Security in Aviation Systems

Lillian Ash Baker

Breaks down civil aviation certification frameworks including DO-356A and ARP4754B to show how safety analyses inform threat modeling and security assurance.

Summary

Aviation Certification Foundations

Civil aviation safety has traditionally relied on established engineering standards such as DO-178. As aircraft architectures incorporate widespread digital connectivity, security standards like DO-356A have become essential components of modern airworthiness certification.

Safety Analyses and Design Assurance Levels

Development standards ARP4754B and ARP4761A define system development and safety analysis processes. Design Assurance Levels (DAL) quantify system criticality based on potential failure condition severity.

Bridging Safety Analyses into Threat Modeling

Safety hazard assessments directly inform security threat models. Analyzing architectural interdependencies enables engineers to identify where cyber threats could trigger critical safety failures across airborne equipment.

Security Assurance Levels and Mitigations

Security mitigations are assigned specific Security Assurance Levels (SAL). Implementing verified security controls ensures that software and hardware components meet airworthiness compliance mandates.

Related talks